Alienware 15 R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware 15 R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware 15 R4
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '19 at 16:21
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 646
71% 563 Pts
64-Core 778
48% 778 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 0876) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 123
Parallax 96.2
84% 107 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 98.2
Splatting 105
83% 100 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 EVO 1TB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 2124 2137 2160 2160 2114 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,178
Write 2,138
Mixed 1,372
SusWrite 2,139
440% 1,957 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 63.2
205% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 978
DQ Mixed 1,040
782% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 200%
This bench: 328%
Great: 378%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
858GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 486 483 483 482 482 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 132%
Samsung 970 PRO 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1913 2129 1280 1163 1167 1167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 1957
Write 2,139
Mixed 1,599
SusWrite 1,470
403% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 52.3
4K Write 97
4K Mixed 68.2
218% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,177
DQ Write 1,052
DQ Mixed 1,108
833% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 239%
This bench: 286%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 859B BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 25.7
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 15 R4 Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Alienware 15 R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback