Gbt___ NVDAACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemGbt___ NVDAACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M55SLI-S4
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20081022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 10:33
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 45.3
15% 33 Pts
4-Core 53.9
8-Core 52.1
7% 53 Pts
64-Core 30.1
2% 30.1 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 22%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD(1002 0D00) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 27.6
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 26.4
7% 26.6 fps
MRender 16.7
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 29.9
6% 23.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 7%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$50
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 36 15 36 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 11.3
Write 9.3
Mixed 13.9
SusWrite 25.8
11% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 36 63 29 82 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 30.8
Write 47.5
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 52.8
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 63%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
207GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 13 8.9 17 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
8.74% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 13.5
Mixed 18.6
SusWrite 12.3
20% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.74%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
181GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 11 14 9.6 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.66% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 23
Mixed 16.8
SusWrite 12.5
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.66%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
MC Read 1.9
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1
4% 1.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 0.4
3% 1.13 GB/s
Latency 422
10% 422 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical NVDAACPI Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ NVDAACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $355Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback