Gbt___ NVDAACPI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics7.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGbt___ NVDAACPI  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-M55SLI-S4
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20081022
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '19 at 11:03
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4800+-$150
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Memory 10.5
1-Core 32.7
2-Core 50.6
17% 31.3 Pts
4-Core 65.2
8-Core 60.7
8% 62.9 Pts
64-Core 64.6
4% 64.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4770
AMD(1002 0D00) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
7.91% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 10
Parallax 9.66
8% 9.71 fps
MRender 8.14
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 13.2
8% 9.75 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.91%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 23 21 24 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 33.9
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 22.7
18% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 99 97 97 107 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.8
Write 101
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 99.6
65% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 63%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
207GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 18 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 25.2
Write 27.3
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 18.6
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
181GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 22.5
Mixed 24
SusWrite 18.5
31% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.49% Terrible
MC Read 3.3
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.7
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 1.7
5% 1.8 GB/s
Latency 399
10% 399 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NVDAACPI Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Gbt___ NVDAACPI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback