Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 17:53
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 92.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 225
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 568
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 569
35% 569 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1658 MHz, MLim: 1903 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 68.3
63% 74.5 fps
MRender 77.5
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 65.4
58% 71.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,679
Write 3,880
Mixed 3,977
931% 4,179 MB/s
4K Read 341
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 233
920% 257 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 665
506% 691 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Ocz-vertex2 3.5 115GB
13GB free
Firmware: 1.29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 61 60 61 58 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
46% Average
Read 189
Write 75.7
Mixed 108
SusWrite 60.7
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 24.4
99% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 82.8
68% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
238GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 72 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 93.5
Write 88.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 71.5
59% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 74%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
114GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 86 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 123
Write 112
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 80.3
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-198.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback