Hp-pavilion KC787AV-ABA d4996t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHp-pavilion KC787AV-ABA d4996t  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Burbank
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081217
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '19 at 00:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 71.9
1-Core 43
2-Core 85.9
44% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 172
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 64.6
56% 68.4 fps
MRender 76.3
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 57.3
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 131 130 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 148
Write 126
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 128
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 85%
Inateck 1TB
345GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 23.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 23.3
32% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 300%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
20.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KC787AV-ABA d4996t Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KC787AV-ABA d4996t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback