Lenovo 20M90010US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20M90010US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M90010US
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 22 '19 at 18:55
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 50.5
26% 40 Pts
4-Core 89
8-Core 161
15% 125 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Legend(17AA 225F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1607 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.97
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.13% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 9.75
8% 8.99 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 15
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6227
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.45% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.91 fps
MRender 3.95
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 5.04
3% 3.75 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.45%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 406 388 421 416 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 939
Write 417
Mixed 498
SusWrite 418
126% 568 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 19.9
65% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 201
155% 208 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD Micron 18ASF2G72HZ-2G6E1 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M90010US Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20M90010US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback