Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '19 at 20:06
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 42.2 2-Core 86.2 45% 68.1 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 168 23% 169 Pts	64-Core 170 11% 170 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 3.28 3% 3.66 fps	MRender 3.95 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 4.68 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 166 131 134 127 129 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60% Above average	Read 249 Write 231 Mixed 229 SusWrite 152 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 31 103% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 190 143% 192 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 60GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 132 134 134 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 243 Write 130 Mixed 123 SusWrite 133 35% 157 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 17 76% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 47.1 66% 122 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 73%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 14GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 13 13 13 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	9.16% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 12.3 Mixed 15.1 SusWrite 12.6 19% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 2.9 145% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.16% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 ID:02 9E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 ID:07 02 51264Y133I ID:01 98 9905471-006.A01LF 52GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.7 20% 7.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.6 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	227x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	49x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	37x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	231x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	62x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	32x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	9x
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	8x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 44GBUnknownBench 21%, 16 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $116