Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	213% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	59 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 64.2 1-Core 158 2-Core 308 92% 177 Pts	4-Core 613 8-Core 1183 107% 898 Pts	64-Core 2,207 137% 2,207 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3629 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.9% Good	Lighting 69.8 Reflection 77 Parallax 74.7 57% 73.8 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 75.8 Splatting 65 69% 87.2 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 389 386 348 371 394 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	213% Outstanding	Read 1,541 Write 1,674 Mixed 831 SusWrite 542 256% 1,147 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 72.9 249% 86.9 MB/s	DQ Read 990 DQ Write 837 DQ Mixed 942 698% 923 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 213% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 442GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2153 591 606 611 524 616 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 2,164 Write 2,005 Mixed 1,490 SusWrite 850 364% 1,627 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 78.5 241% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,363 DQ Write 1,045 DQ Mixed 1,152 876% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 133 134 119 130 136 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	83.9% Excellent	Read 164 Write 180 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 128 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 143 145 129 139 148 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 146 Write 132 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 138 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 153 151 136 144 154 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 149 Write 148 Mixed 85.6 SusWrite 144 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 139 140 123 132 142 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 163 Write 160 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 132 102% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.1 184% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 143 142 127 138 146 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 152 Write 148 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 137 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 107%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 836GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 101 116 116 100 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 28.5 Write 108 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 110 57% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 101%
Generic Mass-Storage 16GB 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 10GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 5 5.4 4.6 5.8 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	2.71% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 1 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 5.1 5% 4.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.71% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 23.3 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 25.4 59% 20.6 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,137x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,716x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,260x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	913x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	880x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	698x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	275x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $1,196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16