HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3646h
Memory12.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 14:56
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 42.9
2-Core 85.9
45% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 164
22% 167 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.28
3% 3.65 fps
MRender 3.57
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.51 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 140 122 123 120 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.4% Good
Read 255
Write 241
Mixed 225
SusWrite 142
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 34
108% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 189
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
65GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 132 133 134 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 222
Write 136
Mixed 113
SusWrite 132
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 18.8
84% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 45.5
66% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:02 9E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 ID:02 9E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 ID:07 02 51264Y133I ID:01 98 9905471-006.A01LF 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
21.7% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback