Intel NUC8i7HVB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel NUC8i7HVK
MotherboardIntel NUC8i7HVB  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '19 at 22:37
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8809G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 668
72% 571 Pts
64-Core 652
40% 652 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 11
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 56.5
9% 34.9 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 55.5
42% 51.1 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 784 664 666 655 652 572 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,513
Write 2,302
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 665
382% 1,712 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 90.7
301% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 1,266
DQ Mixed 1313
993% 1,334 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 294%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSD.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 31.2
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 28.8
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 56.8
70% 56.8 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i7HVB Builds (Compare 724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i7HVB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback