Intel NUC8i7HVB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIntel NUC8i7HVK
MotherboardIntel NUC8i7HVB  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180423
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 02 '19 at 07:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8809G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 200
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 672
64% 532 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Intel(8086 2073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 36% Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 727 566 558 558 552 540 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,392
Write 2,190
Mixed 1,411
SusWrite 583
367% 1,644 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 84.4
280% 97.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1306
DQ Write 1,120
DQ Mixed 1,180
893% 1,202 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 272%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S26BFSD.16FD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.9
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 83%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC8i7HVB Builds (Compare 724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel NUC8i7HVB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback