Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	91.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	276% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190506
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '19 at 21:54
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 252 83% 151 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 834 80% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,330 82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Asus(1043 04C4) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.3 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Lighting 109 Reflection 91.5 Parallax 182 89% 128 fps	MRender 90.6 Gravity 128 Splatting 130 97% 116 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 664 661 663 664 655 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	276% Outstanding	Read 2,562 Write 2,376 Mixed 1,503 SusWrite 710 399% 1,788 MB/s	4K Read 65.5 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 87.8 294% 103 MB/s	DQ Read 919 DQ Write 816 DQ Mixed 856 645% 864 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 276% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 224GB free Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 973 701 588 595 596 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,395 Write 1,234 Mixed 1,155 SusWrite 738 254% 1,130 MB/s	4K Read 65.4 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 86.2 289% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,006 DQ Write 953 DQ Mixed 971 731% 977 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$74 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 275GB free Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 419 415 412 415 413 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 467 Mixed 426 SusWrite 416 102% 454 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 94.6 4K Mixed 51.6 171% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 358 DQ Mixed 302 246% 349 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 828GB free Firmware: CC49 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 210 212 211 211 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 175 Mixed 93 SusWrite 209 124% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS5C1010CLA382 1TB 2,729 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 600GB free Firmware: JC4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 108 109 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 103 Write 93.2 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 108 65% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 99GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 86 87 87 88 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 135 Write 153 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 87.4 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.3 243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 75%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 322GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 103 102 102 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 96.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 102 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 69%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 184GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 110 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 101 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2D3200C16 2x16GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $965

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)