Asus H87-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus H87-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140303
Uptime	66 Days
Run Date	Jul 08 '19 at 15:53
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 90.4 1-Core 116 2-Core 226 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 583 61% 487 Pts	64-Core 593 37% 593 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 391.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Lighting 54 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 49.8 44% 53.3 fps	MRender 51.2 Gravity 51.3 Splatting 58 44% 53.5 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 256GB 4,588 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: JURA0101 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 456 Write 245 Mixed 244 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 37.8 124% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 353 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 185 152% 223 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 109%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 152GB free Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 545 534 539 547 544 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 623 Write 535 Mixed 480 SusWrite 541 122% 545 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 70.5 238% 87.4 MB/s	DQ Read 773 DQ Write 635 DQ Mixed 920 630% 776 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 363%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 124GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 70 73 71 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 77.8 Write 67.5 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 72 48% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 100%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239 995 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 474GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 129 132 130 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 119 Write 135 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 131 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.7 190% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 122%
Hitachi HDN728080ALE604 8TB 1,150 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 275GB free Firmware: A4GNW91X SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 107 109 110 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 99 Write 107 Mixed 64 SusWrite 110 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.7 172% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 110%
Hitachi HDN721010ALE604 10TB 330 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 6.5TB free Firmware: 83XN SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 214 216 215 223 221 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 218 Mixed 105 SusWrite 218 136% 186 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.1 310% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 135%
BUFFALO BSCR15TU3 -CF/MD 16GB 15GB free, PID 021f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 26 26 26 32 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.4% Below average	Read 140 Write 60 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 26.3 74% 66.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.6 164% 3.03 MB/s

BUFFALO BSCR15TU3 -SD 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 81GB free, PID 021f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26% Poor	Read 85 Write 78.5 Mixed 60 SusWrite 24.9 80% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 3 198% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 2x8GB 2,915 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.2 57% 19.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87-PRO Builds (Compare 573 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87-PRO

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	139x
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	75x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	56x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	35x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	17x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	16x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $229

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16