Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus E3 PRO GAMING V5  (all builds)
Memory19.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 417
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 403
25% 403 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 63.7
60% 70.3 fps
MRender 69.3
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 69.5
57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 452
Write 396
Mixed 392
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 86.2
4K Mixed 33.4
119% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 248
194% 271 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 106%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
734GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 71 73 79 80 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 73
111% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
355GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 99 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 96.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 96.7
124% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
440GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 71 73 79 80 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 59
Write 53.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 72.8
69% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 37%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
845GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 99 99 98 99 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 166
Write 137
Mixed 84
SusWrite 96.7
155% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G Apacer 78.C1GM3.C7Z0B 9905678-173.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
50% 80.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3 PRO GAMING V5 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback