Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus E3 PRO GAMING V5  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '19 at 16:26
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 155
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 385
44% 345 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 73.2
Parallax 63.4
60% 69.9 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 66.7
Splatting 68.3
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 236
Write 316
Mixed 381
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 75.1
4K Mixed 39.5
127% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 120
132% 225 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G Apacer 78.C1GM3.C7Z0B 9905678-173.A00G 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 21.1
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E3 PRO GAMING V5 Builds (Compare 257 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus E3 PRO GAMING V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $162
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback