MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive332% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C95
MotherboardMSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)  (all builds)
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 131
57% 93.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 623
48% 427 Pts
64-Core 1569
97% 1569 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.76
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 188
Parallax 187
137% 181 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 177
Splatting 126
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 125%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
640GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2417 2421 2421 2422 2006 761 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2448
Write 2403
Mixed 2,268
SusWrite 2,075
518% 2,299 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 81.4
263% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 462
DQ Mixed 568
421% 560 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 332%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
266GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 120 110 108 131 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 127
Write 143
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 115
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 1TB
290GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 102 101 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 100
120% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
929GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 108
Write 43.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 40.6
70% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2Z3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
MC Read 36.4
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 32.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 28.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95) Builds (Compare 1,224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B550M PRO-VDH (MS-7C95)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $609
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback