Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '19 at 12:28
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 210
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 637
63% 515 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 11 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 21
13% 17.1 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 18.8
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
250GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 786 1725 819 824 824 825 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 2,274
Mixed 1,811
SusWrite 967
424% 1,895 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 83.3
271% 92.5 MB/s
DQ Read 768
DQ Write 711
DQ Mixed 798
583% 759 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 278%
Great: 340%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$107
3TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 196 195 195 196 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 188
Mixed 27
SusWrite 193
107% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
7GB free, PID e1f1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 21 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 35
Write 7.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 19.6
20% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.1
88% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $191
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback