Dell OptiPlex 7040

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7040
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7040  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '19 at 21:48
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 595
55% 459 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 37.1
32% 35.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 36.2
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.Y
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 1.6 426 151 477 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 449
Mixed 306
SusWrite 256
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 38.1
138% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 66.2
121% 237 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 108%
SanDisk SSD Plus 480GB-$40
307GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 360 135 64 89 180 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 383
Write 370
Mixed 299
SusWrite 195
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 11.6
44% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 15
14% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 137 141 143 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 128
Write 122
Mixed 70
SusWrite 140
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 37 35 31 36 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 33
Write 28
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 34.6
41% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 44%
EASTIC FP120 1GB
0GB free, PID 5720
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.7
1% 0.62 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
9% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 029E0000802C CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 859B0000802C CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 20.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23.2
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7040 Builds (Compare 5,176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7040

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback