Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '19 at 18:51
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 94
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 349
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 84
54% 72.2 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 56.3
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 226 226 229 230 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
67.7% Good
Read 253
Write 235
Mixed 235
SusWrite 227
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 34.7
110% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 179
141% 196 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 123%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
1GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 57.5
Write 63.3
Mixed 43.8
41% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
10GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 93 72 45 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 101
Write 104
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 66
62% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 69%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-00ERMA0 500GB
2GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 25.9
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
8GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 26.7
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 20
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
158% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 63%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
2GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 27
Mixed 23
SusWrite 19.7
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback