Asus X200MA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus X200MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X200MA
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140404
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '19 at 13:03
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2830 10,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 52.2 1-Core 19.8 2-Core 25.3 25% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 36.4 8-Core 35.7 5% 36.1 Pts	64-Core 35.9 2% 35.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 15BD) 1.8GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.73% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.06 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.73% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 110 126 87 85 105 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.3% Above average	Read 161 Write 154 Mixed 206 SusWrite 113 36% 159 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 32.9 111% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 116 94% 133 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR6R-PB 1x4GB 186 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 6.5 15% 5.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 3.1 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X200MA Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 15%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X200MA

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	50x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	25x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	24x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	136x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $50Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 15%, 196 samples	24x
HMT451S6AFR6A-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 16%, 130 samples	23x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $50

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus X200MA

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Asus X200MA

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)