Dell Studio 1747

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio 1747  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J509P
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 27 '19 at 19:15
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 29.1
2-Core 59.7
38% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 140
16% 125 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Dell(1028 02EB) 1GB
Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.713.3.2000
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 4.33
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 2.83
Splatting 5.09
4% 4.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 39 42 39 65 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 98.2
Write 75
Mixed 55
SusWrite 49.2
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 62%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
898GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
21.7% Poor
Read 28
Write 24.3
Mixed 25
SusWrite 25.3
35% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.5
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1747 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1747

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback