Asus A58M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A58M-E  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '19 at 22:38
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 43.2
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 120
42% 75.3 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 193
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 22.7
1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.6.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 41.4
Parallax 64.2
27% 46.4 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 32.2
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Klevv NEO N500 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 18 41 29 39 24 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.6% Poor
Read 239
Write 208
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 51.7
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 11.1
46% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 5
DQ Mixed 17.9
25% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
82GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 138 133 130 119 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 138
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 126
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
40GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 87 87 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 83.2
Write 95.2
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 86.5
58% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
193GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 81 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 75.7
Write 42.8
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 80
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 3.7
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58M-E Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A58M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback