Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 69 2-Core 139 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 431 42% 342 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 125E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Lighting 7.5 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 7.56 6% 13.4 fps	MRender 9 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 15 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Acer(1025 1260) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.73 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 31.5 28% 30.3 fps	MRender 35.7 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 23.2 24% 30.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 348GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1705 991 817 818 815 817 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2257 Write 2,045 Mixed 1,650 SusWrite 994 389% 1,736 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 82.2 4K Mixed 60.4 195% 63.9 MB/s	DQ Read 516 DQ Write 453 DQ Mixed 485 363% 485 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 355%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 538GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 453 382 443 433 452 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 447 Mixed 435 SusWrite 433 101% 450 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 41.2 134% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 350 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905630-063.A00G 1x16GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 13.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	371x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	196x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	144x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	114x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	57x
THNSNK256GVN8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 2,371 samples	27x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	130x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	51x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 2x4GBHynixBench 61%, 15,613 samples	45x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16