Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 25 '19 at 19:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,004
97% 800 Pts
64-Core 1133
70% 1133 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3613 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.6
39% 49.1 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 47.6
Splatting 62.1
49% 59.3 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 432 441 422 449 410 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 436
Mixed 425
SusWrite 431
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 49.8
180% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 117%
Great: 127%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
618GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 433 442 424 453 438 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 406
Mixed 397
SusWrite 438
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 47.2
165% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
700GB free
Firmware: JA0OA590
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 98 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 39
SusWrite 98
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 57%
Hitachi HTS541010A9E680 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 109 108 108 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 108
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
SABRENT 120GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 38 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 35
Mixed 25
SusWrite 38.2
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
28GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 53.7
Mixed 31
SusWrite 56.8
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 36%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
503GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 64 65 67 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 71.7
Write 66.7
Mixed 43
SusWrite 65.5
82% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 39.8
MC Mixed 33.1
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 29.5
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback