Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 14:22
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 761
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 381 392 390 383 391 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 474
Mixed 368
SusWrite 388
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 51.4
180% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
509GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 367 378 377 367 377 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 446
Write 410
Mixed 430
SusWrite 373
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 55.4
124% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 306
248% 351 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 125%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
247GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 416 427 427 416 427 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 402
Mixed 419
SusWrite 423
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 52.9
159% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 251
197% 270 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 109%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
268GB free
Firmware: V56OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 63 61 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 52
Write 63.2
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 62.1
38% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
269GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 99 96 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 91.5
Mixed 71
SusWrite 97.5
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
572GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 93 92 89 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 81.5
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 91
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 1TB
315GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 36 35 36 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 34.7
Write 21.5
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 36.1
39% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 22%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB
209GB free, PID 6518
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 221 224 227 222 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 240
Mixed 213
SusWrite 224
310% 225 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 21.3
1,586% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 38.4
DQ Mixed 29.6
2,404% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 157%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3334 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 30.9
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback