Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 21 '19 at 14:08
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 760
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 1,029
64% 1,029 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 391 389 381 390 389 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 424
Mixed 405
SusWrite 387
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 88.8
4K Mixed 51
171% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
536GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 376 375 367 376 374 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 429
Mixed 371
SusWrite 372
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 46.1
160% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 310
250% 353 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
247GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 425 425 418 428 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 402
Mixed 425
SusWrite 420
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 44.4
154% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 242
191% 264 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
271GB free
Firmware: V56OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 63 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 61
Write 57.7
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 62
40% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
275GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 98 96 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 103
Write 113
Mixed 63
SusWrite 95.8
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
577GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 105 107 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 83.4
Write 90.7
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 106
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 76%
WD My Book 1TB
315GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 32.9
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 36.1
45% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 22%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB
209GB free, PID 6518
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 227 226 222 227 226 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 251
Write 213
Mixed 215
SusWrite 225
304% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 21.3
1,675% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 38.3
DQ Mixed 29.4
2,394% 30.7 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 169%
Great: 232%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3334 MHz clocked @ 1667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 36.1
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 42.5
SC Mixed 29.8
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback