Biostar X370GT3

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar X370GT3 (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 67.1 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 158 60% 104 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 292 39% 290 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.6.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 68 Parallax 93.8 55% 76.4 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 57.1 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 10 99 17 5.5 38 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.5% Poor	Read 147 Write 98 Mixed 78 SusWrite 68.8 22% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 7.9 35% 9.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 102%
IS916 innostor 16GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 11GB free, PID 0916 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 114 Write 39 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 38.9 72% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.5 121% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBR2 2x8GB 1,457 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 30 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 30.4 SC Mixed 24.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370GT3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT3

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	5x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 2700AMD $185Bench 74%, 123,820 samples	4x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	4x
RX 6600AMD $330Bench 86%, 20,866 samples	3x

SSD
XPG SX6000 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBAdataBench 177%, 12,504 samples	2x
SPECTRIX S20G 1TBXPGBench 202%, 1,404 samples	2x
MZNTD256HAGL-00000 256GBSamsungBench 61%, 1,302 samples	1x

RAM
KD4AGU88C-26N1600 1x16GBUnknownBench 46%, 29 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x4GBCorsairBench 76%, 16,490 samples	2x
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16