Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160329
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 130
55% 89 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 398
37% 310 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 67.4
Reflection 69
Parallax 84.9
55% 73.7 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 57.3
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 55 43 41 46 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 358
Write 128
Mixed 165
SusWrite 57
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 22.1
65% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 127
108% 159 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
391GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 83 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 121
Write 130
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 83.4
72% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUH721008ALE604 8TB
526GB free
Firmware: LHGNW384
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 170 180 177 163 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 191
Mixed 88
SusWrite 170
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.4
300% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 127%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
348GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 78 78 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 58.3
Write 59.5
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 75.1
84% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 127GB
58GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 12 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 13.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 12.2
25% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
94% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8
6GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 11 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 133
Write 27
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 10.3
44% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 32%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
91GB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44% Average
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 80
141% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44%
Great: 92%
Intenso External USB 3.0 5TB
23GB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 78 84 84 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 83.1
125% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
171% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 69%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
3TB free, PID 578e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 83 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 146
Write 149
Mixed 110
SusWrite 82.2
161% 122 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback