PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z170 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 22 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3360 x 2100 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160909 |
Uptime | 17.5 Days |
Run Date | Nov 22 '17 at 10:41 |
Run Duration | 244 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
72.5%
Very good
|
||||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 127GB
118GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
65.4%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 369x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 357x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 151x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 143x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 79x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $659 |