Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 87.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 976
88% 739 Pts
64-Core 1,351
84% 1,351 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Dell(1028 3735) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 121
Parallax 125
106% 126 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 125
Splatting 100
105% 133 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,557
Write 2,356
Mixed 1,509
475% 2,141 MB/s
4K Read 68.8
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 95
326% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1225
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,171
883% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel SSDSCKGW256H6 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: BG11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 239 229 205 233 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 377
Write 275
Mixed 299
SusWrite 226
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 43.8
152% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 159
151% 236 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
0GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 833 325 324 324 325 322 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,396
Write 1,170
Mixed 616
SusWrite 409
200% 897 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 59
228% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,153
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 701
653% 1,006 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 202%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 31.4
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback