Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '19 at 09:18
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 973
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Dell(1028 3735) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 122
Parallax 124
106% 125 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 124
Splatting 98.7
104% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,554
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,528
478% 2,150 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 95.1
325% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,207
DQ Write 1,133
DQ Mixed 1,163
875% 1,168 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Intel SSDSCKGW256H6 256GB
0GB free
Firmware: BG11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 228 235 221 214 255 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 371
Write 320
Mixed 299
SusWrite 231
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 43.5
151% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 161
153% 241 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
0GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 911 324 325 323 323 324 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,394
Write 1,167
Mixed 622
SusWrite 422
200% 901 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 61.9
231% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,174
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 691
649% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 204%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 31.8
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 27.7
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 102%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $578
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback