Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 14:28
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 184
62% 112 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 729
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 942
58% 942 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 53.9
Reflection 68.8
Parallax 88.3
44% 70.3 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 56.9
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1448 1259 1256 1256 1183 1141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,283
Write 1,696
Mixed 1,460
SusWrite 1,257
374% 1,674 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 225
4K Mixed 86.9
322% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,502
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 1,297
984% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 327%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
402GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 678 460 460 460 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 453 389 270 275 272 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 136
Write 254
Mixed 187
SusWrite 345
53% 230 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 22.5
99% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 165
146% 218 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$201
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 106 108 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 102
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 105
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.3
226% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
45GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.2 0.1 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 87.5
Write 25.3
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 9.7
35% 34.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
74% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 23.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 17.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback