Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 103
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 686
68% 557 Pts
64-Core 925
57% 925 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.5% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 87.6
54% 74.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 56.5
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
726GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1370 1130 1141 1113 1098 1101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,251
Write 1,877
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 1159
380% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 93.3
336% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,537
DQ Write 1,169
DQ Mixed 1,309
990% 1,338 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 324%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
402GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 506 905 453 453 453 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 443 339 267 268 271 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 329
Write 427
Mixed 366
SusWrite 339
83% 365 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 32.6
117% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 264
195% 256 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 106 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 101
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 106
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
229% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
45GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 0.1 12 18 18 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 89.8
Write 26
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 11.8
36% 36 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
78% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.6% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.7
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 18.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $856
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback