Asus B150M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B150M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJun 15 '19 at 03:26
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29% Poor
Memory 25.6
1-Core 48.8
2-Core 83.6
29% 52.7 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 223
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 29%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 120
Parallax 122
108% 125 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 128
Splatting 102
107% 135 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP300 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$120
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FM11.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 129 138 28 13 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 326
Write 235
Mixed 199
SusWrite 79.6
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 16.9
47% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 281
218% 303 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 143%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
96GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 155 155 157 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 166
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 154
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-4GVR F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-2400C15-4GVR F4-3200C16-8GTZR 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 282
14% 282 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus B150M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback