Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	18.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120106
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '19 at 14:28
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 97.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 215 82% 141 Pts	4-Core 426 8-Core 677 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 797 49% 797 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 366A) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Lighting 70.3 Reflection 69.8 Parallax 62.8 57% 67.7 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 64.4 Splatting 56.3 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 214 211 211 211 209 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 323 Write 203 Mixed 244 SusWrite 212 55% 246 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 40 133% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 128 97% 129 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 129%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 32GB free Firmware: CXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 97 99 99 99 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 234 Write 222 Mixed 192 SusWrite 98.3 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 46.2 4K Mixed 18.9 68% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 131 101% 140 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 86%
RAID_2T 2TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 938GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 174 176 176 176 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.7% Poor	Read 179 Write 210 Mixed 90 SusWrite 177 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 1.5 15% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 4.4 DQ Write 23.1 DQ Mixed 6.3 7% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 38%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 39GB free Firmware: .252 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 1.3 Write 103 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 42.6 9% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 8.9 34% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 8.9 DQ Write 45.4 DQ Mixed 0.7 8% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 61%
RAID_6T 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 3TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 174 170 174 173 172 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	139% Outstanding	Read 310 Write 313 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 173 147% 205 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 272% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 174% ↑ This bench: 139% Great: 228%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 911GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 98 97 98 98 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 141 Write 95.3 Mixed 52 SusWrite 96.9 70% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 259% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 344GB free Firmware: A11Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 43 43 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Read 112 Write 122 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 42.8 63% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x8GB 7,706 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 3 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 21.5 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.6 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 46.5 86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	406x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	148x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	342x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	331x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16