bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DG33TL
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090715
Uptime19.9 Days
Run DateJun 10 '19 at 17:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 80.4
44% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 84
11% 82.9 Pts
64-Core 82.4
5% 82.4 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 109 96 95 97 97 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 228
Write 220
Mixed 197
SusWrite 117
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 35.2
116% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 41.9
DQ Write 91.9
DQ Mixed 52.1
44% 62 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 118%
Qpxt U3 1TB
405GB free
Firmware: 8104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 34.1
Write 32
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 20.3
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
230% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 74%
WD My Book 1TB
199GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 27.3
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 17.8
34% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback