HP h8-1513c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP h8-1513c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory20.4 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 18:50
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 175
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 485
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.5
22% 31.8 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 34
25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 146 12 8.7 34 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 342
Write 215
Mixed 247
SusWrite 51.5
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 18.3
81% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 138
112% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
884GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 5.7 7.1 6.1 6.1 5.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 6.1
4% 5.12 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 8502 1600 CL9 Series Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1513c Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1513c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $496
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback