Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 07:19
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 776
77% 628 Pts
64-Core 978
61% 978 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 129
Parallax 134
113% 134 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 132
Splatting 104
109% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 288 291 284 275 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 444
Mixed 361
SusWrite 261
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 44.4
151% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 355
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 221 220 219 225 277 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 446
Mixed 400
SusWrite 230
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 51.6
180% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 195
190% 302 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
395GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 222 220 219 225 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 440
Mixed 402
SusWrite 230
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 48.2
170% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 159
128% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
919GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1297 1427 1539 1467 1177 1170 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,791
Write 1,449
Mixed 942
SusWrite 1,346
309% 1,382 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 54
201% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 682
533% 737 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 249%
Great: 302%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
672GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 91 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 51.3
Write 57.7
Mixed 46
SusWrite 89.4
45% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 57%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 209 210 207 211 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 208
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 209
132% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 1.7
385% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 120%
Great: 136%
Corsair Force GT 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 219 218 219 219 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 55.3
MC Mixed 47
141% 49.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 22.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 58.7
68% 58.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 125%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback