Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 07:08
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 788
80% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 136
Parallax 139
119% 140 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 137
Splatting 109
115% 146 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 114%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 272 265 275 276 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 460
Mixed 384
SusWrite 270
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 46
163% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 224 222 224 224 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 483
Mixed 407
SusWrite 224
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 58.5
195% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 159
174% 291 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
395GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 224 222 224 224 228 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 480
Mixed 417
SusWrite 224
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 51.3
184% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 160
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
919GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1083 1223 1220 1205 1114 1187 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1209
Mixed 994
SusWrite 1,172
275% 1,226 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 61.4
219% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 879
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 316
365% 630 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
672GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 95 95 95 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43% Average
Read 54.2
Write 60.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 95.5
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 57%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 209 212 209 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Corsair Force GT 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 219 219 221 221 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 54.1
MC Mixed 44.4
135% 47.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 21.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 120%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback