Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170905
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '19 at 07:40
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 733
73% 593 Pts
64-Core 954
59% 954 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 94.5
Parallax 126
115% 121 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 125
Splatting 99.7
104% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 263 274 277 278 266 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 455
Mixed 359
SusWrite 268
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 38.7
146% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 337
258% 350 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 211 212 208 212 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 453
Mixed 389
SusWrite 211
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 55.8
186% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 351
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
395GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 211 212 208 212 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 455
Mixed 400
SusWrite 210
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 50.2
175% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 98.9
100% 167 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$198
919GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1092 1180 1151 1178 1179 1187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 1,115
Mixed 833
SusWrite 1,161
252% 1,121 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 58.5
198% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 866
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 714
552% 757 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 222%
Great: 302%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
672GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 96 95 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 52.2
Write 63.2
Mixed 43
SusWrite 95.5
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 57%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 204 206 202 205 202 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 207
Write 206
Mixed 92
SusWrite 203
129% 177 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.5
338% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 118%
Great: 136%
Corsair Force GT 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.00A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 221 220 222 219 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 223
Mixed 101
SusWrite 219
138% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.8
360% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 125%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 42
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 43.6
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 21.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 194%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,890 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $884
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback