Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A87TD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '19 at 04:48
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 103
54% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 274
29% 233 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.16
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 30.6
28% 29.6 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 30.7
27% 33.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 748 268 270 233 214 188 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
553GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 69 68 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 72.1
Write 44.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 69.2
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 173 173 173 174 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 100
Write 159
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 172
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
195% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2BC10006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 108
Write 74.3
Mixed 64
SusWrite 108
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $241
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback