MSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7673
MotherboardMSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 21:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 6.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 242
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 600
66% 522 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 62.7
58% 68 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 56.3
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$56
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 24 55 24 131 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 412
Write 333
Mixed 193
SusWrite 81.2
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 17.9
66% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 29.1
DQ Mixed 22.6
18% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 181 181 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 148
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 180
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A01LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-G45 (MS-7673) Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-G45 (MS-7673)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $474
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback