Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L50-B  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '19 at 17:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 51%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4500U-$393
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.4% Poor
Memory 32.3
1-Core 21.3
2-Core 34.4
20% 29.3 Pts
4-Core 49.4
8-Core 56.2
7% 52.8 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F920) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.81
0% 0.76 fps
MRender 1.38
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.04
1% 0.91 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 480GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 349 314 328 357 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 384
Write 336
Mixed 289
SusWrite 344
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 17.6
74% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 98.2
DQ Mixed 39.7
47% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE L50-B Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE L50-B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback