Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 25 '16 at 16:14
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 96.8
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 99.2
56% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 274
28% 225 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 67.7
Parallax 61.2
56% 66.1 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 54.6
52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 960GB-$310
514GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 356
Write 124
Mixed 100
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 2.64
41% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 0.49
12% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 89%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 195
Write 98.1
Mixed 132
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 12.4
75% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 92.3
DQ Mixed 12.9
24% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 77%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
128GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 89.3
Mixed 35.8
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.43
130% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 76%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
51GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 35
Mixed 35
45% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.64
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.57
58% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 18.9
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback