Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '16 at 22:09
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 96
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 96
55% 81.7 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 257
26% 213 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 68.4
Parallax 61.1
56% 66.1 fps
MRender 74
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 960GB-$310
517GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 354
Write 78.8
Mixed 118
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 7.28
48% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1.69
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 0.49
11% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 89%
OCZ VERTEX3 90GB
10GB free
Firmware: 2.22 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 192
Write 101
Mixed 121
30% 138 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 12.4
74% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.5
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 13.1
24% 44.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 77%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
128GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 100
Write 92.4
Mixed 33.7
55% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.81
4K Write 2.57
4K Mixed 0.47
134% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 76%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 64GB
51GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 37
Write 34
Mixed 12.3
33% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.72
4K Write 0.73
4K Mixed 0.59
58% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 19.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,675 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback