MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B98
MotherboardMSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98)  (all builds)
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180822
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '19 at 23:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 297
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 1,101
101% 848 Pts
64-Core 1,141
71% 1,141 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 73.1
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 65
60% 70.9 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 349 393 408 370 281 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 443
Mixed 422
SusWrite 371
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 45.3
150% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 268
223% 323 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
126GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,169
Write 6,938
Mixed 7,550
1,753% 7,886 MB/s
4K Read 625
4K Write 253
4K Mixed 315
1,485% 398 MB/s
DQ Read 1,957
DQ Write 1,237
DQ Mixed 1,329
1,063% 1,508 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WDC WDS1 00T2G0A-00JH30 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: 0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 257 261 264 266 262 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 363
Write 340
Mixed 272
SusWrite 279
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 11.2
42% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 50.7
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 22.2
23% 37.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
272GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 117 118 117 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 116
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
373GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 82.6
107% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 Kingston 9905701-003.A00G Kingston 9905701-003.A00G Kingston 9905701-003.A00G 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 23.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) Builds (Compare 32,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z390-A PRO (MS-7B98) - $246

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $834
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback