Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A58M-VG3+  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 114
58% 91 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 215
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.8% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 50.4
46% 54.5 fps
MRender 69
Gravity 58.1
Splatting 51.7
48% 59.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 91 102 16 25 63 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 249
Write 179
Mixed 201
SusWrite 65.5
39% 174 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 63.6
4K Mixed 27.8
113% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 35.1
54% 101 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
64GB free
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 74 63 91 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 220
Write 205
Mixed 196
SusWrite 113
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 19.2
92% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 23
26% 42.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
455GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 11 12 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 64.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 11.4
19% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
82% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.5% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A58M-VG3+ Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A58M-VG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback