MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 13:50
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 769
77% 627 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3086
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
99% 122 fps
MRender 167
Gravity 109
Splatting 101
100% 125 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 99%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE220S 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1226A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 1000 626 542 263 263 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 915
Mixed 908
SusWrite 597
206% 919 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 77.8
261% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 712
DQ Mixed 469
434% 669 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 202%
Great: 279%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9D8ME-16 04CB 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 26.5
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback