Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A88-V EVO (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130416
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 28 '19 at 05:43
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 142 60% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 404 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.5% Very good	Lighting 86.5 Reflection 92 Parallax 60.7 70% 79.8 fps	MRender 82.9 Gravity 89.3 Splatting 94.7 74% 89 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 599GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 193 85 109 339 216 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230 19,674 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 102 96 101 109 107 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 148 Write 132 Mixed 78.5 SusWrite 105 85% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.3 271% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4.5TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 117 100 106 133 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 131 Write 129 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 120 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.8 244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 89%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDAM32GB 32GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 24GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.2 6.4 6.9 9.4 9.6 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 95 Write 43.3 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 7.4 44% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.1% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 11.2 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	13x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	11x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	6x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	27x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	22x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16