Asus M5A88-V EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A88-V EVO  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '19 at 05:36
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 70.3
2-Core 129
60% 96 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 390
39% 315 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
EVGA(3842 6573) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.7% Very good
Lighting 85.6
Reflection 85.2
Parallax 64.2
70% 78.3 fps
MRender 85.8
Gravity 90.4
Splatting 89.5
73% 88.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ CT1050MX30 1TB
599GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 9.7 379 163 198 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 103%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 67 134 101 110 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 156
Write 104
Mixed 81
SusWrite 109
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.3
271% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 79 146 109 119 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 93.7
Write 128
Mixed 37
SusWrite 118
68% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.7
229% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 89%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDAM32GB 32GB
24GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.3 7.3 6.6 9.5 9.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 104
Write 37.5
Mixed 14
SusWrite 7.3
41% 40.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 1
68% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A88-V EVO Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A88-V EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback